Targeted Radiation Might Help Fight Advanced Breast Cancer: Study

MONDAY, March 24, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- A minimally invasive treatment that delivers radiation directly to tumors may slow progression of breast cancer that has spread to the liver, a new study suggests.

The treatment is called yttrium 90 (Y-90) radioembolization. Doctors insert a catheter through a tiny cut in the groin and guide it into the artery that supplies the liver. Radiation-emitting micro beads are then sent through the catheter and float out to kill small blood vessels that feed the tumor.

Researchers led by Dr. Robert Lewandowski, an associate professor of radiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, looked at the outcomes of 75 patients. The women ranged in age from 26 to 82, and had chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer that had spread to the liver ("metastatic" disease). Their liver tumors were too large or too numerous to be treated with other methods, the authors noted.

Y-90 radioembolization therapy stabilized 98.5 percent of the treated liver tumors, according to the study, which was to be presented Monday in San Diego at the annual meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology.

In addition, 24 of the women experienced a more than 30 percent shrinkage in tumor size after treatment, which caused few side effects.

"Although this is not a cure, Y-90 radioembolization can shrink liver tumors, relieve painful symptoms, improve the quality of life and potentially extend survival," Lewandowski said in a society news release.

"While patient selection is important, the therapy is not limited by tumor size, shape, location or number, and it can ease the severity of disease in patients who cannot be treated effectively with other approaches," he added.

Two breast cancer experts were cautiously optimistic about the findings.

According to Dr. Neelima Denduluri, "while these results appear promising, this is a very small retrospective study," meaning that it fell short of the "gold standard" type of prospective trial that tracks patients going forward over time. "Randomized controlled prospective studies addressing this issue are necessary before radioembolization can be incorporated routinely," she believes.

For now, "in women that cannot receive systemic therapy due to toxicities [side effects], are not eligible for clinical trials that utilize new agents, or have exhausted conventional chemotherapy options, radioembolization may be a choice," said Denduluri, a medical oncologist with Virginia Cancer Specialists in Arlington, Va., a US Oncology Network affiliate.

Dr. Stephanie Bernik is chief of surgical oncology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. She said that while this type of therapy has been used to fight liver tumors, "the ability to use this therapy in treatment of metastatic breast cancer to the liver offers some hope to patients with the disease."

Bernik stressed that, right now, the treatment can only extend survival for women with advanced breast cancer, it is not a cure. However, "as the technique is modified and perfected, it is hoped the [treatment] can help achieve remission in women with advanced disease."

Each year in the United States, about 117,000 patients are diagnosed with breast cancer that has spread to the liver. Chemotherapy is the standard treatment in such cases, but is not effective in, or suitable for, all patients.

Experts note that studies presented at medical meetings are typically considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

-- Robert Preidt
Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved. SOURCES: Neelima Denduluri, M.D., medical oncologist, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, Va., a US Oncology Network affiliate; Stephanie Bernik, M.D., chief of surgical oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Society of Interventional Radiology, news release, March 24, 2014

View the original article here

New Guidelines Might Limit Need for Lymph Node Removal for Breast Cancer

MONDAY, March 24, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Biopsies of so-called "sentinel" lymph nodes under the arms should become more widespread among breast cancer patients, according to updated guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

The group, which represents cancer specialists, said the new recommendations should also restrict the number of women who will require further removal of multiple nodes after biopsy, cutting down on painful side effects.

In sentinel lymph node biopsy, a few lymph nodes are removed and checked for signs of cancer -- hence the name "sentinel." Usually, if these lymph nodes have no cancer, it means the remaining, unchecked lymph nodes should also be cancer-free.

The new ASCO recommendations expand eligibility for sentinel node biopsy and will reduce the number of patients who undergo a more invasive procedure called axillary -- underarm -- lymph node dissection, which carries a higher risk of complications, the group said.

In axillary lymph node dissection, most lymph nodes under the arm on the same side as the breast tumor are removed and examined for cancer. This procedure can cause long-term side effects such as pain and numbness in the arm and swelling due to a build-up of lymph fluid.

The new guidelines state that for women whose sentinel lymph nodes show no signs of cancer, removal of more underarm lymph nodes is not recommended.

The guidelines also addressed the case of women who undergo lumpectomy instead of full mastectomy and are also scheduled for whole-breast radiation therapy to help "mop up" residual cancer. If these patients have signs of cancer in only one or two sentinel lymph nodes upon biopsy, they too may opt to avoid further node removal, the ASCO experts said.

Women who have undergone mastectomy but show signs of cancer's spread in sentinel lymph nodes should be offered further node removal, the guidelines reaffirmed.

The ASCO also said women who are diagnosed with certain breast cancers while pregnant can skip sentinel node biopsy.

The ASCO issued initial guidelines on sentinel node biopsy in 2005. The new guidelines, published March 24 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, are based on the findings of a panel of experts who reviewed studies published between 2004 and 2013.

"The updated guideline incorporates new evidence from more recent studies -- nine randomized controlled trials and 13 cohort studies since 2005," panel co-chairman Dr. Armando Giuliano said in an ASCO news release.

"Based on these studies, we're saying more patients can safely get sentinel node biopsy without axillary lymph node [removal]," he said. "These guidelines help determine for whom sentinel node biopsy is appropriate."

Panel co-chairman Dr. Gary Lyman said, "We strongly encourage patients to talk with their surgeon and other members of their multidisciplinary team to understand their options and make sure everybody is on the same page."

"The most critical determinant of breast cancer prognosis is still the presence and extent of lymph node involvement," he said. "Therefore, the lymph nodes need to be evaluated so we can understand the extent of the disease."

Two breast cancer specialists welcomed the new guidelines.

"Over the past few years, there has been a movement to limit the amount of axillary [lymph node] surgery in patients undergoing breast conservation," said Dr. Stephanie Bernik, chief of surgical oncology at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City.

Bernik said the new guidelines are important because some doctors have been reluctant to move away from further underarm node removal when a patient has even one affected sentinel node. "This update will give surgeons the confidence to tell patients that a sentinel lymph node biopsy may be enough, even if there is evidence of spread, in patients undergoing [lumpectomy]," Bernik said.

"However, it is still important for surgeons to discuss the pros and cons with a patient, as not all [real-world] patients fit the study criteria," she said. "Furthermore, it needs to be stressed that the more limited surgery does not apply to women undergoing mastectomies."

Dr. Debra Patt is the medical director of an expert panel that assesses cancer care guidelines for the US Oncology Network. She said she was "thrilled" at the new ASCO guidelines because they seem to echo the results of recent studies.

"In 2010, a study presented at the ASCO annual meeting showed that women undergoing breast-conservation surgery with clinically node-negative small breast cancers could safely avoid removing all the lymph nodes from under the arm in most cases," Patt said. "There has been greater variance in treatment patterns in my community practice, and I believe these updated guidelines will direct practitioners to evidence-based patient care."

-- Robert Preidt
Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved. SOURCES: Stephanie Bernik, M.D., chief, surgical oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Debra Patt, M.D., medical director, Pathways Task Force and Healthcare Informatics, US Oncology Network; American Society of Clinical Oncology, news release, March 24, 2014

View the original article here